Comments on: Automatic Properties in Visual Studio 2008 http://www.dataman.ro/2007/07/31/automatic-properties-in-visual-studio-2008/ Computer Adventures. Mon, 06 Sep 2010 19:03:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2 By: Joe http://www.dataman.ro/2007/07/31/automatic-properties-in-visual-studio-2008/#comment-18150 Joe Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:24:48 +0000 http://www.dataman.ro/2007/07/31/automatic-properties-in-visual-studio-2008/#comment-18150 heck yeah I'll use it. I'm converting a legacy class to .net It has 64 properties... usual mundane details, first name, last name, address.... yada yada. If I can put each property on a single line like: public string FirstName {get; set; } That definitely looks readable enough to me. heck yeah I’ll use it. I’m converting a legacy class to .net It has 64 properties… usual mundane details, first name, last name, address…. yada yada. If I can put each property on a single line like:

public string FirstName {get; set; }

That definitely looks readable enough to me.

]]> By: Ryan http://www.dataman.ro/2007/07/31/automatic-properties-in-visual-studio-2008/#comment-397 Ryan Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:06:33 +0000 http://www.dataman.ro/2007/07/31/automatic-properties-in-visual-studio-2008/#comment-397 I think you have to think of it from a noobs point of view... if you do that, you realize that in general this approach probably decreases the readability of the code. However, for an experienced programmer, it's pretty obvious what is going on and there is no need to see the extra code. I think I will use this syntax knowing that if anyone comes along in the future and says, "what the heck???" they could probably figure it out pretty quick with a search or two. I think you have to think of it from a noobs point of view… if you do that, you realize that in general this approach probably decreases the readability of the code. However, for an experienced programmer, it’s pretty obvious what is going on and there is no need to see the extra code. I think I will use this syntax knowing that if anyone comes along in the future and says, “what the heck???” they could probably figure it out pretty quick with a search or two.

]]>